Posting Pictures without Photosuckit

This forum is for general topics. Keep all posts, images, etc safe for those who read the forum at work. Post only that content that you'd want your mama to read. Violators will be banned.
User avatar
SLSS
Posts: 6890
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 6:24 pm
Location: Home
Contact:

Re: Posting Pictures without Photosuckit

Post by SLSS » Fri Aug 18, 2017 4:07 pm

IMG_0278.jpg
IMG_0278.jpg (77.36 KiB) Viewed 530 times
Just testing

It's you Yard.
It's lime the battles between sperm whales and giant squid half a mile below the surface of the ocean. Only it happens in the palm I your hand.- thndr

when I fall, I am still cold and wet, but much more stylishly dressed. as my hat disappears in the riffle- flybug.pa


"Sugar? No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough."

User avatar
Bruiser
Posts: 3451
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Land of Manana

Re: Posting Pictures without Photosuckit

Post by Bruiser » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:34 pm

Red, Thanks for the tutorial. I resized a bunch of crappy photos, but each time I try your method I get an error that tells me the file is much larger than it actually is. Every time. I'll put them on a flash drive and try another computer when I have another hour to kill!
That sounds awesome in my ears!! (P-A)

we were basking in goodness here with our everyday drivel that we enjoy.... the rest of this is horseshit, flybug.pa.

User avatar
yard4sale
Posts: 1696
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 4:12 pm

Re: Posting Pictures without Photosuckit

Post by yard4sale » Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:48 pm

Bruiser wrote:
Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:34 pm
Red, Thanks for the tutorial. I resized a bunch of crappy photos, but each time I try your method I get an error that tells me the file is much larger than it actually is. Every time. I'll put them on a flash drive and try another computer when I have another hour to kill!
Ha! It isn't just me. I get the same deal bruiser.

And Rick is just a show off.
You can't go back and you can't stand still
If the thunder don't get you then the lightning will

User avatar
Upsetter
Posts: 2158
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:53 pm

Re: Posting Pictures without Photosuckit

Post by Upsetter » Tue Aug 22, 2017 8:25 pm

If it's really important to them, they'll fix it. Just stop posting photos and just post literary content. Like AJ. I give it a try most every Friday, then most every Friday I'm told my prick's [sic] too big. That IS what she said.

User avatar
B.M. Barrelcooker
Posts: 3222
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:57 pm
Location: Aintry

Re: Posting Pictures without Photosuckit

Post by B.M. Barrelcooker » Tue Aug 22, 2017 8:29 pm

It works for me

And my Photobucket account still hosts 3rd party.

For now.



Just wAit though.
They will realize that their extortion doesn't work.
They need to find a reasonable price structure and they will be okay. If they keep being selfish greedy bastards they will be replaced.


I think the "BM" on this mound actually stands for "bowel movement"; one of Franzen's, if I'm not mistaken...


User avatar
austrotard
Posts: 8707
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 2:24 am
Location: the austrocity exhibition
Contact:

Re: Posting Pictures without Photosuckit

Post by austrotard » Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:05 am

can you lot still see this?

Image

cheers,
shoesybootin thru the cracks mitch
49% of americans assume I give a shit about what they think.

User avatar
upshitscreek
Posts: 993
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 8:44 pm
Location: lost and found bin

Re: Posting Pictures without Photosuckit

Post by upshitscreek » Wed Aug 23, 2017 9:04 am

There's a survey you can fill out.
IMG_0077.PNG
IMG_0077.PNG (105.17 KiB) Viewed 368 times

User avatar
brownsville
Posts: 688
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:25 pm
Location: yurp

Re: Posting Pictures without Photosuckit

Post by brownsville » Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:37 pm

nah, fuck it all

I can post one shitty photo, as an attachment, then it fucks up
P1060124.JPG
P1060124.JPG (271.58 KiB) Viewed 274 times
^^ with some shitty data that won't get t'ae fuck


but trying to put a tr together is just too much like hard work, life's too short

see you fellas, have fun on mugbook if that's your bag


edit: google images help page can offer some, err, help

Photos Resources‎ > ‎Photos & Picasa FAQ‎ > ‎Google Photos‎ > ‎How to‎ > ‎
How to get a direct link to an image (of a specific size)
To share a picture in a forum, blog,... often you need a direct link to the jpg so it would be shown embedded in a post.

Using the following steps you can get a direct link... but mind, this procedure isn't documented by Google, so even though it is not likely, the behavior could change in the future:

yeh, righty ho, we know a song about that


Go to the image you want a direct link to on photos.google.com
Right-click the image and choose:
in Chrome: "Copy image URL"
in Internet Explorer: "Copy"
in Firefox: "Copy image location"
Now you can use "Paste" to put the link wherever you like. This is an example of such a link:
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/86arO ... 27-h711-no
(Optional) If for any reason you would like to have a shorter link to use, you can always use any url shortener on it, eg. https://goo.gl/, https://bitly.com/,...
(Optional) Some sites want to explicitly have an image extension at the end of the URL, you can try adding either -tmp.jpg or ?.jpg at the end:
-tmp.jpg:
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/86arO ... no-tmp.jpg
?.jpg
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/86arO ... 11-no?.jpg
An image of a specific size

If you want to get an image of a specific size, you can edit the link above as explained here.






There are different parameters you can use to get different effects, but none are documented by Google, so the behavior could change or disappear at any moment.

^^Love this line, I'm getting too old for this shit so shoot me

You can always change the number(s) used in the parameters explained below with any other number to get a different size. If you request a size larger than the "physical" size uploaded to Picasa Web Albums, the physical size of the image will be returned (example, if you request the image in 200 pixels wide, and you ask for 300 pixels, only an image of 200 pixels will be returned).

These are the "known" parameters by the Picasa TCs... If you know of any other, please post your finding on the picasa support forum:
"s400": this gets the image with width or height (whichever is larger in the original image) resampled to 400 pixels. The other dimension will be 400 as well in case of a square images, otherwise it will be proportionally smaller.
Eg.:
landscape image (original: 2048 x 854 pixels, result: 400 x 167 pixels):
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/sZl-o ... 3vbtw=s400
portrait image (original : 1196 x 2048 pixels, result 234 x 400 pixels):
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/9XANu ... sumOg=s400
"w400": this gets the image resampled so the width is always 400 pixels.
Eg.:
landscape image (original: 2048 x 854 pixels, result: 400 x 167 pixels):
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/sZl-o ... 3vbtw=w400
portrait image (original : 1196 x 2048 pixels, result 400 x 685 pixels):
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/9XANu ... sumOg=w400
"h400": this gets the image resampled so the height is always 400 pixels.
Eg.:
landscape image (original: 2048 x 854 pixels, result: 960 x 400 pixels):
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/sZl-o ... 3vbtw=h400
portrait image (original : 1196 x 2048 pixels, result 234 x 400 pixels):
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/9XANu ... sumOg=h400
"w800-h400": this gets the image resampled in such a way so the width will be maximum 800 pixels and the height will be maximum 400 pixels. So one of the dimensions will be the exact size specified, the other dimension will be the size specified or smaller.
Eg.:
landscape image (original: 2048 x 854 pixels, result: 800 x 334 pixels):
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/sZl-o ... =w800-h400
portrait image (original : 1196 x 2048 pixels, result 234 x 400 pixels):
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/9XANu ... =w800-h400
"...-c", eg: "w800-h400-c": this gets the image so it is exactly this size. The source image is first resampled so the image is fitting for the limiting dimension, then the other dimension is cropped so the image is the exact size asked. When cropping, it is just the centre of the picture that is kept.
Eg.:
landscape image (original: 2048 x 854 pixels, result: 800 x 400 pixels):
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/sZl-o ... 800-h400-c
portrait image (original : 1196 x 2048 pixels, result 800 x 400 pixels):
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/9XANu ... 800-h400-c
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-Du5s ... stitch.jpg
"...-p", eg: "w800-h400-p": this gets the image so it is exactly this size. The source image is first resampled so the image is fitting for the limiting dimension, then the other dimension is cropped so the image is the exact size asked. When cropping, some algorythm searches the most interesting part of the image, so the result of the cropping doesn't always keep the center of the picture.
Eg.:
landscape image (original: 2048 x 854 pixels, result: 800 x 400 pixels):
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/sZl-o ... 800-h400-p
portrait image (original : 1196 x 2048 pixels, result 800 x 400 pixels):
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/9XANu ... 800-h400-p
"s0", "w0", "h0", "w0-h0": this will get the image in it's original size, without any resampling nor cropping.
Eg.:
landscape image (original: 2048 x 854 pixels, result: 800 x 400 pixels):
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/sZl-o ... QZ3vbtw=s0
portrait image (original : 1196 x 2048 pixels, result 800 x 400 pixels):
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/9XANu ... ZCsumOg=s0
"...-no", eg: "w800-h400-no": this gives a slightly bigger image as a result (for the image I looked into), haven't found out yet what the exact impact is.

User avatar
fatman
Posts: 5018
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:17 pm
Location: where the deer and the antelope play

Re: Posting Pictures without Photosuckit

Post by fatman » Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:49 pm

jfc

I download pics from my camera to (gasp) the "Pictures" folder on my 'puter.

when I want to show you fukkers something, I click on the "Attachments" tag (see below)
and hit "Add files"....which takes me directly to - you guessed it! my "Pictures" file!

I click on the photo that I want you asshats to see, and I get a little message (below) that says
"Place inline". Click on that, and it magically appears in the box I'm typin' in...
60_zpsjkvagzzr.jpg
60_zpsjkvagzzr.jpg (75.59 KiB) Viewed 239 times
if I can figure this shit out, you mental midgets should have no problem.

make with the TR's fuckos :smile
My drinkin' days are over; I'm still trouble bound - Slaid Cleaves

"This place is so fucked up. Where else could you find a thread with a Debbie Gibson song, a chapter from Fyodor Dostoevsky, and a sweet under boob pic like that on the same page?" - Hogleg

"You may not be smart, but your car gets good gas mileage". - Stovetop

User avatar
Surly
Posts: 852
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Merlin

Re: Posting Pictures without Photosuckit

Post by Surly » Wed Aug 30, 2017 7:13 am

Image

Works fine with PicasaGoogleFuckAll
"If the trout are lost, smash the State." Thomas McGuane

User avatar
LA Fly Guy
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:40 am
Location: SELA

Re: Posting Pictures without Photosuckit

Post by LA Fly Guy » Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:32 am

I've been using imgur since the Photosuckit debaucle. Photosuckit can suck it.

User avatar
brownsville
Posts: 688
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:25 pm
Location: yurp

Re: Posting Pictures without Photosuckit

Post by brownsville » Wed Aug 30, 2017 3:06 pm

Fats,

like I said, attachments are ok for one photo or another, [ along with the unwanted exif crap, as you have demonstrated]

was lurking on the suk for three years before I plucked up the courage to post an intro

this place was the foremost fly fishing forum on earth, and was made to feel welcome

my first tr from orkney was posted contemporaneously, for the most part, off a shitty laptop using photoshitbags

I might be an uneducated, snaggly-toothed, limey, commie, fuck-wit, who can't tie my laces, but suggestions as to 3rd party hosting my shitty pics would be appreciated

thanks

and kisses

Post Reply