User avatar
By m.b.
#300543
just saw this...what was the question?



and how is me posting a link from fox (about an article written by a guy from the NY Post) to stir conversation any different from you posting shit from the myriad of leftists blogs and websites you quote ad nauseam?

yeah, that's what i though.
User avatar
By m.b.
#300680
you actually believe that shit?


you think that this government isn't watching that billionaire camel-jockey like a hawk (actually, now that i think about it, maybe they aren't?) you think that obama wouldn't like to hang fox by the nuts if his intelligence resources could confirm that were true?

posting shit like that doesn't do much for your credibility.
#300686
m.b. wrote:you actually believe that shit?


you think that this government isn't watching that billionaire camel-jockey like a hawk (actually, now that i think about it, maybe they aren't?) you think that obama wouldn't like to hang fox by the nuts if his intelligence resources could confirm that were true?

posting shit like that doesn't do much for your credibility.
I'm sure he is being watched closely, but I also doubt there's any actionable illegality in donating to the family of a kid who just committed suicide.
User avatar
By m.b.
#300688
ok, then what was your point?

obama'a got connections to a known terrorist bomber...one that was actually convicted and went to jail...in bill ayers. that didn't stop you from voting for him.

why the sudden concern with connections to terrorism?
#300693
m.b. wrote:ok, then what was your point?

obama'a got connections to a known terrorist bomber...one that was actually convicted and went to jail...in bill ayers. that didn't stop you from voting for him.

why the sudden concern with connections to terrorism?
I just figured that knowing that the #4 owner of your favorite "news" source was currently and repeatedly using a loophole to fund terror attacks might be of concern.

Silly me.
User avatar
By m.b.
#300694
but it's obviously not as important to you as putting a guy with connections to domestic terror in the most powerful office in the land.
BigCliff wrote:I just figured that knowing that the #4 owner of your favorite "news" source was currently and repeatedly (allegedly - and alleged by a bunch of commie libs) using a loophole to fund terror attacks might be of concern.

Silly me.
you got that right. we all think that's silly, but where'd i say that's my favorite news source?
#300720
m.b. wrote:you are getting very, very good at putting words in my mouth to try to get an upper hand in a discussion. the libs drake Con's have taught you that technique very effectively.
Fixed.
#301121
m.b. wrote:
m.b. wrote:why the sudden concern with connections to terrorism?


how did you put it? ---

nothing on that one, cliffy? really?
Sorry, I working when I could while at my folks house.

Nothing sudden about it, your implication that I don't care about terrorism is ridiculous. I suppose you're implying that because I don't think we should use any torture method available to get jihadist wackos to talk get to talk means I think they're harmless and deserve full citizenship and Ivy league scholarships or some shit.
User avatar
By m.b.
#301123
oh, i was confused. it seemed like all of a sudden you were concerned about fox news and alleged connections to terrorism, unlike back around election time when confirmed connections to tried and convicted terrorists were of no importance to you.

They're stocktards. Just like the humans. Kill 'em[…]

Thumbing Through Some SBSs

Dessie Paul’s Mayfly https://live.stat[…]

Impeachment pool

teflon don, teflon shawn. I give a fuck. where's […]

Thanks, Honyuker! Now, about that addy? And where[…]

Subsribe to The Drake Magazine