VTNZ wrote:Well Plow, the fact you refuse to articulate what has actually changed, yes does prove my point about Rand
Your ridiculous assumptions and whining remind me of a kid denied access to the cookie jar.
Iran has changed, the whole flipping area has changed. Other than you everyone gets it.
Make the point that it hasn't changed and Rand is flip-flopping the issue, I'm all ears.
Nice rant below, has nothing to do with my point but hits most of your normal buzz words.
....he's beholden to a party of folks like yourself who demand another war on behalf of MIC and Friends yet have no real tangible logic behind war...except to go in guns a blazin'....worked that so well so many other times in recent history huh? But hey Lockheed Martin needs to maintain that share price, right?
Never mind Isis is no friend of theirs either...let's attack a largely unified, stable country of 75 Million with a huge military....cuz, well, we need higher oil prices, more pentagon toys, and body bags. That is the current platform of the R party....
And Rand being appeasing to your sorts, makes him lean more Neo-Con than any true Libertarian...
In terms of the article, and yes, I've eluded to it before, but nothing exemplifies the underlying powers in DC and their motives that operate beyond political D or R....is the F-35 boondoggle....we're now up to estimates of up to 1.6 TRILLION for a fighter jet that can't even fly right....all cuz if you build it in 44 states and bribe each congressmen with jobs in their state for it....it's gotta be good!
If you stand one bit for smaller, more accountable govt, let alone libertarian views, you can't advocate/defend that BS...and yet it goes on and on...by the left and right.