....not that you'd get that kinda reporting from state run media like Fux.....
Still screaming Benghazi is by definition one of the symptoms of being a Fux muppet.
I hope I didn't infer that I was antifingerbanging. Its an art I hold dear. - RT
Upsetter wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 4:08 pm So. The. Fuck. What? All that means is Jeb should be fitted for prison orange just like Clinton. The whole focus of this stoopid “investigation” is basically whether trump did the same thing we KNOW Clinton did - collude with foreign agents to impact the election. And it was actually the Washington free beacon who first hired fusion gps. Furthermore the examiner broke the story and look who followed as quickly as any others.That right there!
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/1 ... t.amp.html
Upsetter wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 9:05 pm The free beacon wasn’t a candidate for president in 2016 was it? There’s no way you could find Trump or the Trump campaign guilty of anything without locking Clinton up and throwing away the key. Worst case scenario based on what we know is trump jr and Kushner may have had a meeting where they talked about dirt on Clinton with Russians. Then they walked. End of story.When we are talking about crimes by Hillary are we talking about exchanging emails on a non-classified server? Crimes, Crimes, CRIMES we hear constantly but honestly nothing more than that. She certainly wasn't criminally liable for Benghazi (not even civilly, the lower of the two burdens).
Clinton on other hand solicited the dirt (the full extent of what trump jr. and Kushner are alleged to have done) paid for the dirt, got the dirt, leaked the dirt to the press, and turned the dirt over to the FBI. Then the FBI took the dirt, without verifying any of it, turned it into fisa warrants for secret surveillance, and used the surveillance That’s only amounted to perjury traps on totally unrelated crap to justify this bullshit investigation.
It also discussed Moscow’s apparent overtures to another Trump campaign official and its general meddling during that period, which prompted the F.B.I. to open the Trump-Russia investigation in late July — before the bureau’s investigative team received Mr. Steele’s information.FBI verified the portions used.
Notably, the Democratic memo also said that in subsequent renewals of the wiretap application, the Justice Department “provided additional information obtained through multiple independent sources that corroborated Steele’s reporting.”Also found this interesting:
Republican-appointed judges approved the surveillance of Mr. Page.
RockinDaddyNotFromTN wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:34 amWhen we are talking about crimes by Hillary are we talking about exchanging emails on a non-classified server? Crimes, Crimes, CRIMES we hear constantly but honestly nothing more than that. She certainly wasn't criminally liable for Benghazi (not even civilly, the lower of the two burdens.No. I am not talking about emails. I am talking about clintons hiring a law firm which in turn hired GPS fusion which in turn hired a foreign agent who in turn paid Russian agents to produce the dossier. The dossier’s creation in and of itself is a crime of collusion with foreign agents to upset an election.
Upsetter wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 8:20 pm I am talking about clintons hiring a law firm which in turn hired GPS fusion which in turn hired a foreign agent who in turn paid Russian agents to produce the dossier. The dossier’s creation in and of itself is a crime of collusion with foreign agents to upset an election.Four degrees of separation. Well insulated, to be sure.
Upsetter wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 8:20 pmGood lord man. A) As any self respecting trump fan knows, "Collusion" is not a crime, 2) Unlike something like murder for hire where there are specific laws for an involved party that does not actually do the crime (i.e. the person who did the hiring), even if collusion was a crime, there is not "collusion for hire" statute so D) any crime of the kind you are describing would have to fall under conspiracy and someone cannot be convicted, charged, whatever of conspiracy without knowledge and it's been reported that the clinton campaign didn't know about fusion gps never mind chris steele.
The dossier’s existence is more evidence of Clinton’s collusion with foreign agents to disrupt an election than anything produced by the investigation on trump to this day.
It doesn’t matter if the foreign agents are British Ukrainian or Russian, collusion with foreign agents to disrupt an election domestically is the crime and she has been proven guilty. If it wasn’t for the medias obsession to prove Trump a traitor she would have been convicted long ago. They want to use conclusive evidence of her guilt, the dossier itself, to try and prove his guilt despite almost everything in that steaming pile of horeshit having been proven false. This is why they are all a bunch of worthless shit heels that should be disbelieved before there ever believed. Period
Funny thing though...It doesn’t matter how big a pile of steaming horseshit the dossier is, Clinton is still guilty of collusion with a foreign agents to disrupt an election for having it created in the first place.
And fwiw on the emails...The gross negligence standard is a criminal standard, and she was guilty of it. Just because cumme and stropf used different words “extremely careless” instead of gross negligence (stropf changed it doncha know!!) doesn’t make her any less guilty. there was a dude who was prosecuted under the same standard and found guilty for taking a family photograph with a nuclear submarine in the background. I do believe he still in jail. The whole thing is fucking sewer slime.
BRF’s Hi-vis Callibaetis Spinner https[…]
good shit. I miss the salt. Did you buy that hou[…]
Yeah buddy - you good with the date?
covids soooo last week. mate.