I dunno, the guy has been at the center of several major military fiascos both in his roles in iraq and afghanistan. While I think he is a VERY effective field commander, actually on the ground with his troops, in iraq, he was also at the heart of the tillman debacle, he was responsible for one of the publicized detainee horror shows, and now in his role in afghanistan he has twice undermined civilian control of the military.The Volfish wrote:The LAST thing you could call him is insubordinate.
The thing is, as the afghan commander, he was listened too, he got all that he wanted and BO was still on board with his strategy. COIN as its called, is his baby, so however its being implemented is his problem to deal with. Doesnt sound like the troops on the ground like it very much. If you read the whole RS article, a bunch of it was dedicated to his interaction with a company that had just lost a guy to an IED they felt shouldnt have been there except for the edicts coming down from McCrystal about ROE.
Seems to me that things werent going well for the general, or his counter-insurgency strategy, esp. with the people who mattered most to him, his troops. He may very well have intentionally made the incendiary comments so as to go out with a bang, rather than a quiet whimper.